| http://www.jpl.nasa.gov/galileo/mess43/ocndscvd.html Carr
was visibly impressed with the way these
enormous, 3-to-6-km-wide blocks, scarred with
ridges, were tipped and rotated. This motion, he
explained, could not be accounted for by wind or
slope, but could be caused only by the traction
of currents in a liquid medium.
Paul Geissler from the University of Arizona,
and also new to the panel, concurred. The tilted
bergs, he explained, showed just how thin the
surface here was--perhaps only 1- or 2-km thick!
[Thin indeed compared to a 100-km (60 mi.) deep
ocean.] Geissler also explained that convection
in solid ice (suspected on Ganymede) could not
account for all the observed movement. And the
lack of any feature higher or deeper than a few
hundred meters would be consistent with a 1- or
2-km layer of floating ice [remember, icebergs
are 90 percent below the surface].
Max Coon of the Northwest Research Association
displayed a picture of pack ice in the open water
of the Earth's own Arctic Ocean for comparison.
Such floes, he explained, frozen in a winter sea,
would resemble Europa's bergs even more closely.
Open water on Europa would boil and freeze at the
same time; the rapid freezing would seal in
further loss; the water vapor released into space
would settle as snow and help color the whitest,
brightest surface in the solar system.
|